7 March 2019 (Last Updated January 28th, 2020 10:12)
Energy Vault has created a new storage system in which a six-arm crane sits atop a 33-storey tower, raising and lowering concrete blocks and storing energy in a similar method to pumped hydropower stations. How does the process compare to other forms of energy storage, such as batteries and pumped-storage hydro?
The influx of renewable energy to national power grids has hit something of a bottleneck. While technological innovation in energy storage has taken off, the current infrastructure is limited in the amount of energy that can be stockpiled from intermittent sources such as solar and wind power.
Renewable energy is becoming more affordable, but the unstable nature of production and reliance on the right solar and wind conditions has held back renewables in the quest to replace fossil fuels.
Taking its inspiration from hydropower, Switzerland-based start-up company Energy Vault has developed a new kind of storage method. The system essentially harnesses the power of the Earth’s gravitational pull, using concrete bricks that are raised and lowered automatically by a crane.
How does the technology work and how does it compare to other forms of energy storage?
Modernising a time-honoured technique
The storage technology incorporates basic principles of physics that have been used in the production of pumped hydropower plants for years. In pumped hydro systems, water flows down from an upper reservoir to a lower reservoir, passing through and rotating a generator or turbine. Water is then pumped back up from the lower to the upper reservoir, at some electrical cost, which again rotates the turbine and the system is repeated, thus generating and containing electricity.
In a similar vein, Energy Vault has developed a six-arm crane to lift 5,000 concrete blocks – weighing 35t in total – up and down a 33-storey building, which store gravitational potential energy when they are raised, and release it as they are lowered.
“In each gravity-based energy storage, a certain mass is moved from a lower point to an upper point – with the use of a pump, if water for example – which represents ‘charging’ the storage, and from a higher to a lower point which creates a discharge of energy,” says Energy Vault CEO and co-founder Robert Piconi.
“Increasing the height of a large mass implies storing electricity in the form of potential energy. On the other hand, in order to release the power, kinetic energy is created from the downward movement of the mass, thereby creating the electricity.”
The innovation comes in its application of cloud-based automation software, which operates the six-arm crane mechanically, and manages the distribution of power to either store energy from solar and wind assets, or discharge it to the grid when needed.
Comparing energy storage solutions
Existing energy storage systems are currently very costly. Take Tesla’s 100MW/129MWh battery technology in Australia, for example, which cost the company around $66m to produce. Hydro-electric power storage plants that require man-made dams to produce energy can cost billions of dollars to construct, although they can store significantly more energy than 100MW. The largest hydro storage plant in the world is the Bath County Pumped Storage Station in Virginia, US, which cost $1.6bn in 1985 and has a storage capacity of around 24,000MWh.
In contrast, Energy Vault’s gravity storage units cost around $7m-$8m to build, and have a lower levelised storage cost of electricity, which measures on a per kWh basis the economic break-even price to charge and discharge electricity throughout the year. It is considered by some to create a more accurate measurement of energy costs.
“Our solution is lower-cost than pumped hydro plants both on an initial capital expenditure basis and – more importantly – on a levelised cost of storage (LCOS) basis, according to the independently published Lazard banking models,” says Piconi.
“The LCOS takes into account not only the initial capital expenditure but also the operating, maintenance and replacement cost. Based upon these models, pumped hydro has a LCOS of $0.17/kWh; our Energy Vault solution is below $0.05/kWh.”
Equally, Energy Vault’s system is around 50% cheaper than battery storage technology, in particular lithium-ion batteries, which can have an LCOS of around $0.25/kWh-$0.35/kWh. One of the reasons for this is the cost of battery materials, which is much higher than the cost of concrete provided to Energy Vault by Mexican company Cemex.
Another important innovation is the incredibly short ramp rates. A ramp rate is the time taken for a plant’s power output to ramp up or down. The ramp rate for Energy Vault’s gravity storage solution is as little as one millisecond, and the storage system can go from zero to 100% power in no more than 2.9 seconds. Furthermore, the system has round-trip power efficiency, i.e. zero to full power to zero, of 90% efficiency, meaning only 10% energy loss.
“Because pumped hydro requires you to utilise a motor-driven pump to move the water to a higher location, there is a significant loss of energy storage capacity of approximately 30%,” Piconi adds.
“Pumped hydro plants have a round-trip efficiency of around 70%, whereas the Energy Vault system has a round-trip efficiency of between 88%-92%, which allows for a greater energy storage capacity and thus fundamentally better economics.
Can it compete in the long term?
Indian energy provider Tata Power was one of the first firms to show interest in bringing the gravity storage system into commercial operation. In November 2018, Energy Vault made a deal with Tata Power to deploy a 35MWh system this year. The project, which is fairly small-scale compared to the technology’s potential, will have a peak power output of 4MW.
While Energy Vault would not comment on the ongoing negotiations with Tata Power, Piconi believes interest in the new storage solution is growing worldwide.
“We are working on many large projects on all continents globally with more than 150 customers,” he says. “These customer segments include energy developers, utilities, corporate enterprises and government organisations.”
Ultimately, however, according to Energy Systems Catapult infrastructure and energy storage practice manager Alex Buckman, the success of gravity storage solutions will depend on their ability to be cost-competitive with other forms of storage in the long term. While the economics of Energy Vault’s system look favourable now, this isn’t guaranteed to remain the case.
“The challenge that may face gravity-based storage technologies is the reconciliation of their relatively long technical life against the risk of being stranded by future reductions in cost of competing technologies,” says Buckman.
“However, there are potential advantages in high round-trip efficiencies, negligible self-discharge and an ability to participate in multiple markets. Novel gravity-based technologies show potential to be technically valuable to future energy systems if they can provide certainty to investors of their long-term market.”